![]() ![]() Fox Blocks ICFs produce fire-resistant homes, unlike wood and steel homes.Construction of a wind-resistant wood-framed home costs 25–30 percent more than standard wood-frame construction.Wind-resistant Fox Blocks, along with steel and CMU framed homes, lessen the need for costly repairs or even rebuilding after a severe wind event, like a tornado or hurricane.Disaster-resistant framing minimizes the costs of repairing and rebuilding after a natural disaster:.The susceptibility of wood to moisture can lead to expensive repairs and maintenance.Steel and concrete blocks also resist moisture.Unhealthy mold leads to costly maintenance and repair bills. This feature controls moisture intrusion and prohibits the growth of mold. Durable Fox Blocks provide a solid continuous monolithic concrete wall with a perm rating below 1.0.Durable framing lowers the long-term costs of maintenance and repair:.Fox Blocks homes with energy efficient windows and doors and quality roof insulation will provide a high-performance Net Zero Ready home. ![]() ![]() Wood and steel framing promotes thermal bridging, which lowers the effective R-value of a home.Homes constructed with ICF exterior walls require 32 percent less energy to cool and 44 percent less energy to heat than wood-framed homes.Energy-efficient Fox Blocks ICFs, with an R-value of 23 and high thermal mass, exceed ASHRAE/ANSI 90.1 energy code requirements.Energy-efficient framing reduces utility bills:.Does the framing method contribute towards an energy-efficient, durable-, disaster-, and pest-resistant house? When comparing framing methods, homeowners must consider the long-term expenses, such as maintenance, utility bills, insurance and repairs. This saves money and time because it quickens construction by eliminating the need to synchronize multiple trades. For most regions of the U.S., wood and concrete block framing both offer a slightly less costly framing method than ICF and steel framing.įox Blocks ICFs save on upfront costs due to the all-in-one wall assembly that combines five construction steps into one, structure, air barrier, insulation, vapor retarder, and attachment. The upfront building expenses of framing materials and labor vary by location, which makes it difficult to compare the costs of different framing methods. The most cost-effective framing material for a new home project must consider the initial material and labor costs and the long-term cost of ownership and operating expenses to the homeowner. Comparing the Short and Long-Term Costs of House Framing Methods Selecting the best framing option for your home involves evaluating upfront construction costs and long-term expenses, along with each method's strengths and weaknesses. The framing of a house provides the structure that gives a home its shape, and provides the outer shell for the exterior coverings. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |